The situation regarding the victim who withdrew his testimony on Wednesday is very concerning and could have been foreseen considering Thomas Lubanga’s influence in Ituri where miltias are still active and some are still close to him. Lubanga’s supporters still have the ability to cause harm which must have informed the withdrawal of the witness’s testimony He must have feared for his family and himself knowing that his testimony would be broadcast on TV. There need to be more guarantees for the safety of victims-something that has not been well defined so far and that has worried many more than just the witnesses themselves. This is the beginning of a legal battle which will be full of surprises and emotions.
In addition the disruption of the Court’s screening of the trial in Bunia, Ituri, confirms the concern we expressed regarding a potential in situ trial in DRC. The security issue remains a challenge in a region where militias are still active and Lubanga’s supporters are strong. This type of incident could have been foreseen and demonstrates the issues we have been raising for a while concerning outreach. The screening room is not the place to start explaining only how a trial takes place. Rather, I believe that Lubanga’s supporters needed to understand that the judge is there to assess the truthfulness of each allegation and fact.



















